Watching AI evolve.
Understanding what comes next.
The current source text is the original text and can be switched to the Chinese translation.
arXiv:2611.05382v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Misinformation spreads faster than professional fact-checkers can manually verify it and write articles explaining their verdicts. This creates a need to automate the production of fact-checking articles. This paper details work done by the DS@GT ARC team for CLEF 2026 CheckThat! Lab Task 3 Fact-Checking Article Generation. We seek to generate a full fact-checking article from a claim, its original verdict, and a set of scraped source documents. Our team built a four-stage pipeline that cleans noisy evidence, retrieves and clusters relevant sources, generates the article by conditioning \texttt{Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct} on the original fact-checker verdict, and recovers inline citations through deterministic post-processing. We achieved a mean score of 0.428 and ranked 3rd out of 9 teams for the CLEF 2026 CheckThat! Lab Task 3, compared to a baseline mean score of 0.272. Our code is available on GitHub at https://github.com/dsgt-arc/checkthat-2026-task3.
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
The content of this article comes from arXiv cs.CL，Copyright belongs to the original author and publisher.
Read the original ↗Discuss the facts and ideas with respect. Comments appear after moderation.
Loading comments…