Watching AI evolve.
Understanding what comes next.
The current source text is the original text and can be switched to the Chinese translation.
arXiv:2610.31684v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Graphs (KGs) have been popularized during the last few decades and are increasingly constructed and consumed by Large Language Models (LLMs). Various applications therefore rely on KGs to provide concise, complete, accurate, faithful, fresh, and traceable answers. However, what is the quality of those KGs? In which cases should a KG be used, and can it be trusted to ground an LLM? How might it be evaluated? We reviewed the literature on quality assessment (QA) of data, information, linked data, KGs, and the intersection of KGs and LLMs. We extended the current state-of-the-art frameworks to a catalog of 24 quality dimensions (QDs) and various quality metrics (QMs). Furthermore, we propose a general-purpose, customizable to a domain or task, and practical QA framework for assessing the quality of KGs.
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
The content of this article comes from arXiv cs.CL，Copyright belongs to the original author and publisher.
Read the original ↗Discuss the facts and ideas with respect. Comments appear after moderation.
Loading comments…