The current source text is the original text and can be switched to the Chinese translation.
SaveShare
Overview
arXiv:2610.37590v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many real-world optimization tasks are governed not only by what should be optimized, but also by what is allowed: a solution must first satisfy physical, operational, safety, budgetary, or structural requirements before its objective value becomes meaningful. Yet benchmark design for constrained continuous optimization often treats these restrictions as fixed properties of predefined test instances. Existing generators and benchmark suites provide essential foundations for reproducible comparison, but they either focus primarily on configurable objective landscapes or expose constraint properties within limited, predefined regimes, making it difficult to ask targeted questions about constraint-induced difficulty: whether an optimizer struggles because feasible regions are small, boundaries are restrictive, variables are tightly coupled, or constraint information is poorly scaled. We introduce GNBG-C, a Generalized Numerical Benchmark Generator for Constrained Continuous Optimization. The central idea is to treat the feasible region itself as a configurable object rather than as an inseparable attachment to a fixed test function. By generating controlled constraint regimes around the known GNBG global minimizer, the generator enables systematic studies in which feasibility pressure can be varied while preserving that point as a global minimizer of the constrained problem. This allows researchers to examine how optimizers discover feasibility, handle constraint pressure, and improve objective quality under diverse and controllable feasibility conditions. GNBG-C therefore provides a flexible and auditable framework for probing the strengths and weaknesses of constrained continuous optimizers under targeted forms of feasibility-side difficulty.
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
READ THE ORIGINAL
Read the original for the full context.
The content of this article comes from arXiv cs.NE,Copyright belongs to the original author and publisher.
arXiv:2610.36022v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Image and video generators can produce spatially consistent visual content, but how to use this capability to improve spatial understanding remains underexplored. We study this problem from two perspectives: geometric supervision during training and explicit geometric evidence during inference.
arXiv:2610.36138v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: If rotating a problem never changes its answer, one might expect its best model to be rotation-invariant; we show that this fails, predictably and by an exact amount, when capacity is limited. A symmetry groups a model's directions into blocks of equally strong directions, a symmetric model must use each block whole, and when the budget cuts a block every optimal model breaks the symmetry.
Loading comments…