The current source text is the original text and can be switched to the Chinese translation.
SaveShare
Overview
arXiv:2610.36018v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce a Stein variational framework for sampling from a target density $p\propto e^{-U}$ when the target potential $U$ is possibly non-smooth. The key idea is to introduce a smoother reference potential $U_0$ and the anchor weight $a=e^{U-U_0}$. The resulting anchored Stein variational gradient descent (SVGD) algorithm is able to target $p\propto e^{-U}$ without computing the gradient of $U$ and include standard SVGD as a special case. In particular, we allow the target potential $U$ to be locally Lipschitz while the reference potential $U_0$ is continuously differentiable, along with other suitable assumptions. Under this low regularity regime, we establish a Kullback-Leibler first variation formula for anchored perturbations, identify the corresponding steepest descent direction in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space and prove a nonasymptotic convergence bound for the anchored SVGD algorithm in terms of an anchored kernelized Stein discrepancy. Finally, we also provide guidance on constructing a suitable reference potential $U_0$ based on $U$.
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
READ THE ORIGINAL
Read the original for the full context.
The content of this article comes from arXiv stat.ML,Copyright belongs to the original author and publisher.
arXiv:2610.36022v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Image and video generators can produce spatially consistent visual content, but how to use this capability to improve spatial understanding remains underexplored. We study this problem from two perspectives: geometric supervision during training and explicit geometric evidence during inference.
arXiv:2610.36138v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: If rotating a problem never changes its answer, one might expect its best model to be rotation-invariant; we show that this fails, predictably and by an exact amount, when capacity is limited. A symmetry groups a model's directions into blocks of equally strong directions, a symmetric model must use each block whole, and when the budget cuts a block every optimal model breaks the symmetry.
Loading comments…