Watching AI evolve.
Understanding what comes next.
From coding assistants to collaborative systems: what agents can do, and where they fall short.
An agent chooses actions and tools in pursuit of a goal; a workflow follows a more predefined path. Reliable deployment needs clear permissions, observable results and a way to stop or escalate when a step fails.
arXiv:2610.22507v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Command-line interface (CLI) agents increasingly execute longer-horizon tasks, yet existing benchmarks either assume that user instructions remain fixed throughout execution or evaluate task outcomes without capturing runtime collaboration quality.
arXiv:2610.22373v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agents are increasingly used as autonomous orchestrators in distributed and multi-agent systems, yet a control gap remains: no protocol-level mechanism allows human operators to inject binding directives that persist across planning cycles.
arXiv:2610.22379v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Calibrating expensive engineering simulators requires tuning model parameters to match reference data, a process heavily constrained by computational costs. This study investigates whether Large Language Models (LLMs), conditioned on physical diagnostic descriptions of simulation errors, can propose informative parameter updates more efficiently than conventional derivative-free optimizers.
arXiv:2610.22499v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human communication is inherently multimodal, conveying intent not only through linguistic and vocal cues but also through visual signals. However, existing conversational systems have mainly focused on text or speech, leaving out the visual feedback that is essential for natural interaction.
arXiv:2610.22381v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When a fact becomes harder to elicit from a language model, has the model lost it, or has it merely become less accessible? Parameter-updating test-time continual learning agents are usually evaluated by current output accuracy; we ask whether that measurement captures how prior experience shapes later updates.
arXiv:2610.22408v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon GUI agents rely on visual history to maintain task states, but retaining historical screenshots increases visual-token usage and inference costs, while textual summaries can discard critical state information, undermining long-horizon reliability.
arXiv:2610.22426v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents are used to check records against an organization's requirements, for example whether a vulnerability report is ready for investigation. Requirements often allow several ways to be met, such as a severity rating with a curator-reviewed advisory or a published advisory link.
arXiv:2610.22420v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent-based models are well-suited for modelling agro-ecological systems for decision-making, yet turning their simulations into actionable insight requires identifying which decisions actually drive the behaviours.
TLDR: I explain what the technical AI alignment problem is and what its core difficulties are, in my view. This is a perspective that draws simultaneously on classical traditions in theoretical computer science / machine learning theory, ideas from analytic philosophy, and views that originated in the Machine Intelligence Research Institute / LessWrong.
Amid a wave of backlash, some industry-friendly groups are employing creative and time-tested strategies to woo the youth.
Adult performers are questioning why Meta allows its AI agent to sext while restricting their social media accounts.
Many thanks to Abram Demski for materially and intellectually supporting this research. Thanks also to Brian Berns, Roman Malov, Gurkenglas, and Lorxus for valuable conversations. Introduction Despite the central place of corrigibility to theoretical AI alignment, it seems like no one can really agree about what is .
